Extinguishing the Spark of Conflict

I had started to reply to your post Kim but realised that I/we may be heading for a fall.

If we did have these agreements it would be incumbent of me to let you know that as much as I Appreciate your reply, and can Acknowledge your point is valid and would be only too pleased to respond. I am sorry but would like to Apologise and ask you if you could rephrase your question as there is an element of rhetoric and accusation which is not Acceptable to me:

"What is the longest you have been able to impose 3A logic on a human interaction?"

To me, the question has an element of accusation in it. The use of the word "imposing” of a certain “logic” which I have allowed myself to be accused by other members of this group before.

The 6A rules of engagement are not my “logic” that I am “imposing” on anyone Kim. I think, rather I am “proposing” 6 words/concepts for anyone to use in a trial agreement when interacting with me, only.
They are there to protect me/them from such possible accusations. So at this stage Kim, I once again apologise, but I don’t feel comfortable continuing until this issue of "imposing" verses “proposing” is addressed which comes under the banner of Accountable language, I think.

Like creativity, I think conflict starts with a spark, but in this case, unlike how creativity needs to be fanned, the spark of conflict needs to be extinguished as soon as possible.

This entry was posted in Agreements. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s